|
PHILOSOPHICAL REFLECTION ON CHRISTENSEN ET AL.'S PROPOSED EXPLANATION OF
SCHIZOPHRENIA AND THE EMERGENCE OF PSYCHOTIC SYMPTOMS
...the strongest continues...
In the explanation of this facts, Christensen et al. related many
scientific findings and made some explanatory hypothesis about some
possible causes (see Christensen et al., 2004). I will represent only the
intelligible core of their explanatory proposal.
The retroviral activation in the brain and cerebrospinal fluid of some
patients with schizophrenia, during acute exacerbations (Karlsson et al.,
2001), may cause, consider Christensen et al., an inflamatory process in
brain's white matter.
This inflamatory process can be folowed by the activation of a
glutamatergic state in brain to which oligodendrocites,
specialized glia that encircle axons with myelin, are very sensitive.
This hyper-glutamatergic state is considered as being toxical.
The ultimate consequence of this toxicity, consider Christensen et al., may
be the decrease of the number of oligodendroglia (Orlovskaya et al., 2000)
and of the physiological alteration of myelination in patients with
schizophrenia,
as were suggested by many studies (Buchsbaum et al., 1998; Lim et al., 1999
and Foong et al., 2000, Lim et al., 1999, Pettegrew et al., 1991 and
Fukuzako et al., 1999).
The disruptions of myelin integrity alter, decreases, the velocity of
transmission of information traversing some myelinated neuronal networks.
This decrease causes the dyssynchrony of the reverberating networks
integrating perception, thought and action, and thereby the emergence of
poorly processed perceptions, disconnected thought processes, and dys-
integrated behavior.
The same dyssynchrony disrupts the elements of perception, attention,
complex processing of information, and behavior in schizophrenia (Miller,
2000).
PHILOSOPHICAL REFINED CONCLUSIONS
The relevance for the philosophy of scientific explanation
The type of explanation that was used by the scientist was clearly causal.
Is their explanation a deduction of an explanandum from a background
theory? Is their explanation a deduction of an explanandum from a law?
Is their proposed explanation a deduction from a causal law? Fundamentaly
we saw at least causal chain/chains. In some places of the chain the causes
are only possible or hypothetized. Phychopatologies are the final results-
effects of some physiologiccal processes or causal chains. We are
confronted here with a complexity. But, however, I do not want to discredit
as others the rational core of the Hemple's model of explanation. The
rationality from every valide explanation is a logical one. But the
sub |